关于 Google 帐号存储空间的重要政策变更

                                                                                                                                                                                              

关于闲置状态和存储空间用量超额的新政策  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ 尊敬的 Google 用户： 您好！谨此通知您，我们近期公布了关于存储空间的新政策，以确保符合行业惯例。这项政策适用于通过 Google 帐号使用 Gmail、Google Drive（包括 Google 文档、表格、幻灯片、绘图、表单以及 Jamboard 文件）和/或 Google Photos的用户。由于您之前已通过上述一款或多款产品使用过您的 Google 帐号存储空间，因此我们希望在新政策生效（于 2021 年 6 月 1 日生效）前，您可以充分了解新政策。下文对新政策作出了简要介绍。请参阅我们的帮助中心文章，查看变更内容的完整列表。 您好！谨此通知您，我们近期公布了关于存储空间的全新政策，以确保符合行业惯例。这项政策适用于通过 Google 帐号使用 Gmail、Google Drive（包括 Google 文档、表格、幻灯片、绘图、表单以及 Jamboard 文件）和/或 Google Photos的用户。由于您之前已通过上述一款或多款产品使用过您的 Google 帐号存储空间，因此我们希望在新政策生效（于 2021 年 6 月 1 日生效）前，您可以充分了解新政策。下文对新政策作出了简要介绍。请参阅我们的帮助中心文章，查看变更内容的完整列表。 新政策（2021 年 6 月 1 日生效）摘要： • 如果您连续 2 年（24 个月）未使用 Gmail、Drive或 Google 相册，我们可能会删除上述处于闲置状态的产品中的内容。用量未达到存储空间配额上限，且信誉良好的 Google One 会员将不会因这项关于闲置状态的新政策而受到影响。 如果您连续 2 年（24 个月）未使用 Gmail、Drive或 Google 相册，我们可能会删除上述处于闲置状态的产品中的内容。用量未达到存储空间配额上限，且信誉良好的 Google One 会员将不会因这项关于闲置状态的新政策而受到影响。 • 如果您的用量连续 2 年超出存储空间上限，我们可能会删除您在 Gmail、Drive和 Google 相册中的内容。 这项政策对您的影响： • 除非您已长达 2 年未使用上述服务，或连续 2 年用量超出存储空间上限，否则这些变更将不会对您产生影响。这项政策会于 2021 年 6 月 1 日生效，因此最快会于 2023 年 6 月 1 日强制执行。 • 2021 年 6 月 1 日之后，如果您存在服务闲置或用量超出存储空间上限的情况，我们会事先向您发送电子邮件提醒和通知。如果我们要删除任何内容，也会以这样的方式提前通知您。 • 即使上述一项或多项服务因出现闲置，或用量超出存储空间上限的情况，而导致内容被删除，您将仍可以登录这些服务。 • 注意：这项关于闲置状态和存储空间用量超额的政策将仅适用于使用 Google 服务的个人用户。Google Workspace、G Suite 教育版和 G Suite 公益版政策目前没有发生变更。管理员应访问管理员帮助中心，了解与自己订阅相关的存储空间政策。 注意：这项关于闲置状态和存储空间用量超额的政策将仅适用于使用 Google 服务的个人用户。Google Workspace、G Suite 教育版和 G Suite 公益版政策目前没有发生变更。管理员应访问管理员帮助中心，了解与自己订阅相关的存储空间政策。 详细了解让帐号保持活动状态的方式 • 如需详细了解如何让上述产品保持活动状态，请访问此帮助中心页面。 如需详细了解如何让上述产品保持活动状态，请访问此帮助中心页面。 • 闲置帐号管理员可协助您管理特定内容，并可在您停止使用 Google 帐号的一段时间（3 - 18 个月之间）后，通知您信任的联系人。注意：无论您的"闲置帐号管理员"设置如何，均需遵守这项关于 2 年闲置状态的新政策。您可以在我们的帮助中心，详细了解这些变更以及管理您自己或亲人帐号的方式。 闲置帐号管理员可协助您管理特定内容，并可在您停止使用 Google 帐号一段时间（3 - 18 个月之间）后，通知您信任的联系人。注意：无论您的"闲置帐号管理员"设置如何，均需遵守这项关于 2 年闲置状态的新政策。您可以在我们的帮助中心，详细了解这些变更以及管理您自己或亲人帐号的方式。 了解如何管理您的存储空间 • 欢迎详细了解用量超额政策，以及哪些内容会占用存储空间配额。 欢迎详细了解用量超额政策，以及哪些内容会占用存储空间配额。 • 您可以在 Google One 应用和网页版 Google One 中免费使用存储空间管理器，以查看您 Google 帐号存储空间的使用情况，还可以释放可供 Gmail、Google Drive以及 Google Photos共用的空间。 您可以在 Google One 应用和网页版 Google One 中免费使用存储空间管理器，以查看您 Google 帐号存储空间的使用情况，还可以释放可供 Gmail、Google Drive以及 Google Photos共用的空间。 感谢您使用我们的服务。 Google 团队敬上 © 2020 Google LLC 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043 我们向您发送这封重要的电子邮件通知，目的是让您了解关于您 Google 帐号的重要信息。

详细了解更新后的《服务条款》

weanews.com@gmail.com 我们一直在不断完善《服务条款》，并让条款内容更易于理解。所做变更将于 2020 年 3 月 31 日生效，并不会影响您使用 Google 服务的方式。 如需了解详情，请参阅我们提供的关键变更摘要 和常见问题解答。下面简要介绍了此次更新对您来说意味着什么： • 提高了可读性：尽管我们的条款仍然是法律文档，但是我们已经尽力将条款撰写得更加易于理解，包括添加了一些指向实用信息的链接并提供了相应的定义。 • 提升了信息传达的清晰度：我们清楚地解释了我们何时会对 Google 服务进行变更（例如新增或移除某项功能），以及何时限制或终止用户的访问权限。此外，如果某项变更会对您的服务使用体验产生负面影响，我们会采取更多措施来通知您。 • 将 Google Chrome、Google Chrome 操作系统和 Google 云端硬盘纳入到了条款中：我们修订后的条款现涵盖 Google Chrome、Google Chrome 操作系统和 Google 云端硬盘，它们还有各自专门的条款和政策，以帮助您了解这些服务特有的相关信息。 • 我们的隐私权政策没有任何变更：我们未对 Google 隐私权政策 和您信息的处理方式做出任何更改。请注意，您可以随时访问自己的 Google 帐号 页面，查看您的隐私设置并管理您数据的使用方式。 如果您的孩子或被监护人尚未达到可以自行管理其 Google 帐号的年龄，且您使用 Family Link 来管理其使用 Google 服务的方式，请注意，请花一些时间与孩子讨论这些变更。 当然，如果您不同意接受新版《服务条款》以及在使用 Google 服务时您和 Google 之间的权利义务关系，请参阅我们的常见问题解答，详细了解您可以做出哪些选择。 感谢您使用 Google 服务。 Google 团队敬上 © 2020 Google LLC, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA, 94043 我们向您发送这封电子邮件，目的是让您了解关于 Google《服务条款》的重要变更。

隐私权政策和隐私控制设置方面的诸多改进

weanews.com@gmail.com 本月，我们将更新现行的隐私权政策，以便让大家更清晰地了解我们会收集哪些信息以及收集此类信息的原因何在。此外，出于保护您的数据和隐私的考虑，我们还采取了多项举措来改善隐私设置检查以及我们提供的其他控制设置。 您当前的设置以及个人信息的处理方式不会发生任何变化。我们只是更清楚地阐述 Google 的数据处理做法，更好地说明可供您用来更新、管理、导出和删除个人数据的选项。 之所以做出这些更新，是因为欧盟即将实施新的数据保护条例，同时我们也希望藉此为世界各地的 Google 用户提供更加细致妥善的服务。 让我们的隐私权政策更加清晰易懂 结构更简明，语言更清晰 我们优化了政策内容的浏览和组织方式，让您能够更轻松地找到所需内容。此外，对数据处理做法的阐释也更为详尽，语言更加清晰。 新增直观的视频和插图 生动形象的可视化描述往往比单纯的文字说明更为直观易懂，考虑到这一点，我们在政策中穿插了一些短视频和插图。 直接跳转到隐私控制设置 现在，从政策内容中可以直接跳转到各项主要设置，让您能够更加轻松地选择隐私设置。 修订后的政策将于 2018 年 5 月 25 日生效，点击此处即可进行查看。 完善您的隐私控制设置 在过去一年中，我们更新了我的活动记录，让您能够更方便地访问和管理 Google 帐号中的数据。我们还重新设计了信息中心，一目了然地为您展示了您所用产品的概况以及与它们相关的个人数据。 本月，我们在隐私设置检查中新增了一些插图和示例，旨在帮助您更明智地选择主要的隐私控制设置。此外，我们明白您的偏好设置可能会随时间而改变，因此，新的隐私设置检查功能让您可以选择定期收到隐私设置检查提醒。 如需详细了解隐私权管理方面的各种控制设置，请访问您的 Google 帐号。 © 2018 Google LLC, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043 我们向 weanews.com@gmail.com 发送这封电子邮件，是为了向您提供有关您 Google 帐号的最新动态。

Google 隐私权政策和服务条款发生变更

				此电子邮件无法正常显示？ 使用浏览器查看
尊敬的 Google 用户： 您好！ 我们将弃用 Google 目前使用的 60 多种不同的有关隐私权的政策，代之以一个统一的、简洁、更易理解的新政策。我们的新政策覆盖多个产品和功能，目的是让用户在所有 Google 产品中获得简单直观的一致体验。 我们认为此变更关系到您的切身利益，因此请务必花几分钟时间阅读我们的新版隐私权政策和服务条款，网址是 http://www.google.com/policies。这些变更将于 2012 年 3 月 1 日生效。
统一的政策，一致的 Google 体验
在各种产品之间轻松切换 我们之所以改用新政策，是因为我们希望给您带来简单、轻松的产品体验：无论哪个 Google 产品，您想用就用！不管是查看提醒您安排家庭聚会的电子邮件，还是查找您想要分享的某个视频，我们都希望您能在 Gmail、Google 日历、Google 搜索、YouTube 或您需要的任何产品之间轻松自如地切换。		专门为您量身定制 如果您登录了 Google 帐户，我们就可以根据您在 Google+、Gmail 和 YouTube 中表现出的兴趣来执行各种操作，比如，提供搜索查询建议，或个性化您的搜索结果。如此一来，当您在搜索"Pink"或"Jaguar"时，我们可以更准确地理解您的搜索意图，并更快地向您显示相关结果。		轻松进行分享与协作 当您在网络上发布或创建文档时，常常希望其他人能查看文档和参与创建文档。只要记住您希望与之共享文档的人的联系信息，我们就可以让您在任何 Google 产品或服务中轻松进行共享，并且最大程度地减少点击次数和出错几率。
我们将一如既往地保护您的隐私 我们的一贯目标是：增加透明度和选择权。这个目标将通过 Google 信息中心和广告偏好设置管理器等产品以及其他工具来实现。我们的隐私权原则依然保持不变。在未获得您的许可的情况下，我们绝不会出售或分享您的个人信息（极少数情况下除外，比如法律要求）。		有疑问吗？ 我们可为您解答。 请访问我们的常见问题解答，了解变更详情，网址是 http://www.google.com/policies/faq。
变更通知 新版隐私权政策和服务条款将于 2012 年 3 月 1 日生效。在更改生效后，如果您选择继续使用 Google，则需要遵守新的隐私权政策和服务条款。 请勿回复此电子邮件。我们不会回复发送到此地址的邮件。如果您在阅读电子邮件或聊天时点击了其中的链接，转到了不受信任的网站，切勿输入您的 Google 帐户密码。您可以直接访问相应网站，例如 mail.google.com 或 www.google.com/accounts。Google 绝对不会通过电子邮件询问您的密码或其他敏感信息。

Yes, Stars Do Love Themselves More

It's one of the classic chicken-and-egg questions of our time: Do self-adoring attention-craving spotlight hogs naturally gravitate towards showbiz, or does showbiz make otherwise modest civilians into self-adoring attention-craving spotlight hogs?Fortunately yesterday, science has provided the answer. (More on that shortly.) Researchers S. Mark Young and Drew Pinsky (a.k.a. "Dr. Drew") of the University of Southern California claim that their study, which will be published in the Journal of Research in Personality, is the first "systematic" and "empirical" scholarly work done on this often perplexing, and more than slightly touchy, subject.And what they found was that -- yes! -- narcissistic personalities tend to seek out the entertainment industry more than any other. What's more, the celebrities with the highest scores on the Narcissistic Personality Inventory were the ones who -- no surprise -- have tended to become famous without any discernible artistic talent, i.e., reality television personalities. And, not that we're looking to start any wars, but the researchers did deduce that women celebrities are more narcissistic than their male counterparts.

NFL makes NBC "Must See TV" again

"Sunday Night Football" truly is the new "Monday Night Football" and pigskin fans could help lead an overall ratings revival at the Peacock Network.
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- NBC finally may show some signs of life this year. That's because the athletic ability of 300-pound linemen will do for the network what a lousy "Friends" spinoff and Martha Stewart couldn't: give NBC a real hit.
NBC has a guaranteed ratings magnet on its hands this season with "Sunday Night Football." Sunday night games used to air on ESPN, but the cable sports network owned by Walt Disney (Charts) will now air Monday night games instead.
ABC, which had broadcast "Monday Night Football" since it began in 1970, will no longer air pro football.
According to data from Nielsen Media Research, "Monday Night Football" on ABC averaged 16.2 million viewers a week, making it the 10th most watched program in prime time last year.
If NBC is able to replicate that, it would instantly become the network's biggest hit. It would also be a huge improvement over last season's Sunday night lineup for NBC.
Of the three shows that the network aired from 8pm to 11pm on Sundays last year, "Crossing Jordan" and "Law and Order: Criminal Intent" averaged slightly less than 11 million viewers apiece, and "West Wing," in its final season, had a paltry audience of just 8 million.
For General Electric (Charts)-owned NBC, which finished in fourth place among 18-49 viewers last season for the second consecutive year, having football become a big hit obviously would be welcome news for the struggling network as it attempts to lure back advertisers.
"NBC has a lot going for them. The NFL is a proven ratings generator and it's the anti-TiVo (Charts). People don't tend to fast forward commercials when watching sports," said Rick Dudley, president and CEO of Octagon Group, a sports marketing firm.
But can Sunday night truly become the new Monday night?
Better games and the best broadcasters
Sure, you could argue that pigskin fans may feel burned out by the time Sunday night rolls around and that they'd rather watch something like ABC's "Desperate Housewives" or CBS' (Charts)s "Without a Trace" instead of another football game.
But there clearly is an audience for more football on Sunday nights. ESPN averaged about 8.9 million viewers a game for its Sunday night telecasts ... a respectable number considering that the cable network is available in about 83 percent of all TV households.
Availability won't be an issue for NBC since it's a broadcast network. What's more, NBC has several other developments working in its favor. One, the NBC Sunday night schedule looks great. (NBC actually kicks off the season on September 7 with a Thursday night game that pits defending Super Bowl champion Pittsburgh Steelers against the Miami Dolphins.)
This Sunday night, NBC has arguably the most anticipated regular season game of the year: the Indianapolis Colts versus the New York Giants (Go Big Blue!). That game pits the Colts' star quarterback Peyton Manning against his little brother, Giants' quarterback Eli Manning.
And later in the season, NBC will have the option of cherry-picking marquee games from Sunday afternoons and moving them to Sunday nights. That's a huge plus for NBC since it means fans won't be forced to watch games featuring a great team against a complete patsy or two mediocre teams playing each other as they did in seasons past.
ESPN often got stuck with games that may have looked intriguing on paper back when the schedules were made in the summer but turned into snoozers by the time fall rolled around.
For example, a Sunday night game last October matching up the Seattle Seahawks, who wound up going to the Super Bowl, and the Houston Texans, the league's worst team, pulled in just 5.7 million viewers. And a game featuring the Kansas City Chiefs against the Texans in November garnered an audience of only 6.8 million.
ABC often had the same problem with its "Monday Night Football" games toward the end of the season.
"One of the things that hurt 'Sunday Night Football' and 'Monday Night Football' was that there was no flexibility in the schedule. NBC won't have that problem," said Brad Adgate, senior vice president of corporate research for Horizon Media, a media buying firm that does work for NBC.
It also helps that NBC snared former "Monday Night Football" broadcasters Al Michaels and John Madden away from ABC to serve as the commentators for "Sunday Night Football." Madden and Michaels may have some critics, but they are widely viewed by many as the best broadcasting team in football.
"NBC has put together the A-plus team in the booth with Madden and Michaels," said Octagon's Dudley.
Some may scoff that people don't watch games because of the broadcasters. But a case can be made that NBC will have an easier time getting fans to adapt to Sunday night being the new Monday night because of the familiarity provided by Michaels and Madden.
Weaker competition bodes well for NBC
NBC may also have an opportunity to do well since other networks' Sunday night schedules don't seem as fearsome as they did two years ago. The critical and fan fervor surrounding "Desperate Housewives" cooled considerably last year, and ratings dipped a bit. ABC also moved its monster hit "Grey's Anatomy" from Sundays to Thursdays.
Plus, football won't have to compete with "The Sopranos" either since HBO isn't going to begin airing the final eight episodes of its hit series until next March at the earliest. (HBO, like CNNMoney.com, is owned by Time Warner (Charts).)
This is not to say that "Monday Night Football" on ESPN is going to be a ratings loser. It should do well also ... just not as well as NBC's broadcasts.
Add that all up and you have a touchdown for NBC on Sunday night ... which should help the network become more competitive in the overall ratings race.
NBC could parlay big ratings on Sunday into interest for new shows that are attracting a lot of favorable buzz, such as "Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip," "Heroes" and "30 Rock," as well as larger audiences for successful sophomore shows "The Office" and "My Name is Earl."
"Football does two things for NBC. It provides a promotional platform that it didn't have before and gives the network one less night that it has to program," said John Rash, senior vice president and director of broadcast negotiations with Campbell Mithun, a media buying firm.
"NBC should break its ratings fall this season and begin to position itself to be significantly more competitive," he added.
And if that's the case, NBC would have football to thank for finally making it Must See TV again.

Board-requested probe backs Merck on Vioxx

$21M report finds management 'acted with integrity' in the development and marketing of Vioxx.
NEW YORK -- A report commissioned by Merck & Co.'s board said Wednesday the drugmaker's top executives did not knowingly put patients at risk in developing and marketing Vioxx, the popular arthritis drug withdrawn after a study showed it increased heart risks.
The 20-month review of the drug company's conduct concluded Merck management "acted with integrity" in the development and marketing of Vioxx, according to former Manhattan federal judge John Martin, who led the probe.
The report, on which Merck (Charts) spent about $21 million, criticized certain Merck promotional activity but generally absolved top management.
"Critics contend that senior officials at Merck knowingly put patients at risk of cardiovascular events rather than jeopardize the profits that Merck generated from the sale of Vioxx," the report said. "After an exhaustive investigation, we have concluded that there is no basis for such a claim."
Martin, along with other lawyers and paralegals at the firm of Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, spent more than 53,000 hours on the 179-page report, which also included about 1,500 pages of appendixes.
They interviewed 115 people including top company executives and drew upon testimony in civil and governmental proceedings.
One securities lawyer who isn't involved in litigation involving Merck questioned the objectivity of the Merck-sponsored report.
"The conclusion of Merck's own counsel cannot possibly be surprising," said Jay Gould, partner in Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP. "I don't know of any firm that wouldn't do what [Debevoise & Plimpton] did. That's our job. We're not paid to be impartial."
Merck board member William Bowen, who led the special committee reviewing the company's Vioxx conduct, said the board was "reassured" the report found company management acted responsibly.
"The main question the board wanted answered was: 'Did the senior people at Merck knowingly put people at risk in ways that they should not have done?'" Bowen said. "There is, I would submit, in the Martin report, no evidence to that effect."
The withdrawal in September 2004 of Vioxx, a $2.5 billion-a-year seller, sent Merck shares tumbling, drew investigations from U.S. authorities and prompted sharp criticism of a pharmaceutical company known for its sterling scientific reputation.
Although Merck shares have largely rebounded, the company continues to face federal probes involving Vioxx and more than 14,200 product liability cases. So far, the company and plaintiffs each have four victories.
The report found no member of Merck management tried to mislead scientists or consumers. It also said there was no support for assertions Merck propelled Vioxx to market without conducting necessary testing. And it rejected claims Merck scientists ignored signals the drug caused heart problems.
The report said it was "worth noting" that several Merck employees were taking Vioxx at the time of its withdrawal. They included its former top scientist, Edward Scolnick, and its general counsel, Kenneth Frazier, as well as the wife of former Chief Executive Raymond Gilmartin and the mother of research chief Peter Kim.
In a negative finding about the company, the report said "certain individuals" in marketing and sales "engaged in practices that were inconsistent with Merck's policies and at times proposed neutralizing critics through means that senior management viewed as unacceptable."
The report criticized some Merck interactions with academic scientists who raised questions about the company and Vioxx. Another criticism involved the use of a promotional aid by sales representatives that failed, on its own, to provide all of the available cardiovascular data on Vioxx.
Bowen said the board also would be working with the company to ensure that further scientific press releases would be clearer, following findings that some press statements involving Vioxx could have been read ambiguously.
The report "raises some questions," Bowen said. "It's up to management now to take advantage of this process."